Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759369AbYFJDNv (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2008 23:13:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758447AbYFJDN0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2008 23:13:26 -0400 Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:52129 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758001AbYFJDNZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2008 23:13:25 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 20:11:09 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Cornelia Huck Cc: Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Vegard Nossum , Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jens Axboe , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Kay Sievers , Neil Brown , Mariusz Kozlowski , Dave Young Subject: Re: [bug, 2.6.26-rc4/rc5] sporadic bootup crashes in blk_lookup_devt()/prepare_namespace() Message-ID: <20080610031109.GE6796@suse.de> References: <20080609020623.b6727f2b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <19f34abd0806090209l541d93c6jaba2704314b34418@mail.gmail.com> <20080609133426.GB20194@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <19f34abd0806090658v54f3a912n2ed30ad6cc20d00@mail.gmail.com> <19f34abd0806090728s3b3fdbeq7dd3d31d02c8f28e@mail.gmail.com> <20080609165757.184724ff@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <20080609153856.GA5149@elte.hu> <20080609191521.1a56b6a6@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080609191521.1a56b6a6@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1685 Lines: 47 On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 07:15:21PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 09:15:40 -0700 (PDT), > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > And this is all still ignoring the locking issue, of course. It would be > > trivial to just remove the block_class_lock, and change > > > > mutex_[un]lock(&block_class_lock); > > > > into > > > > down|up(&block_class.sem); > > > > except for _one_ case, which is > > > > bdev_map = kobj_map_init(base_probe, &block_class_lock); > > > > which really wants a mutex, not a sempahore. > > > > So to fix that, we'd need to make the class->sem be a mutex, and pass that > > in. Which is probably a good change too, but makes the whole thing much > > bigger. > > The driver core changes in -next convert class->sem to > class->p->class_mutex, which makes it non-accessible to drivers. > Most of the locking is easily done through converting to the class > iterator functions, but there are some cases where this is not going to > work: > > - The {register,unregister}_blkdev() functions, which don't directly > involve the class. > - The iterators for /proc/partitions, which take the lock in > part_start() and give it up again in part_stop(). > > Maybe we need a possibilty for a driver to lock a class from outside? Why would that be needed? We protect walking the class lists internally with the lock, that should be sufficient, right? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/