Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755799AbYFJJoO (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2008 05:44:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751329AbYFJJoD (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2008 05:44:03 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:53505 "EHLO opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751014AbYFJJoB (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2008 05:44:01 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:43:59 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Cc: David Brownell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] generic GPIO parameter API Message-ID: <20080610094359.GC6053@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> Mail-Followup-To: Guennadi Liakhovetski , David Brownell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200806052229.37143.david-b@pacbell.net> <20080609165438.GE17278@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Not recommended for children. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 761 Lines: 15 On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 07:09:00PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > The primary purpose of the GPIO-parameter proposal was to allow to > configure these parameters from the user-space over sysfs by extending the > gpio-sysfs patch. And I2S master / slave operation should not be > switchable over sysfs, should it? Not via that API, anyway (apart from anything else both ends of the link need to agree) - I was more mentioning it as an example of a non-GPIO function that could use the GPIO configuration. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/