From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.26-rc: x86: pci-dma.c: use __GFP_NO_OOM instead of __GFP_NORETRY
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:14:24 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9
Cc: Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xs4all.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20080526234940.GA1376@xs4all.net> <1212682484.4332.7.camel@n2o.xs4all.nl> <20080610102347.GC19136@elte.hu>
In-Reply-To: <20080610102347.GC19136@elte.hu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200806101014.25089.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
DomainKey-Status: no signature
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1092
Lines: 25

On Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:23 am Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xs4all.net> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 12:15 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xs4all.net> wrote:
> > > > Okay, so how about this then ?
> > >
> > > applied to tip/pci-for-jesse for more testing. Thanks,
> >
> > I've thought about it a bit more, and I think the actual patch that
> > really does what everybody wants is this one instead:
>
> applied a delta patch version of the one below to tip/pci-for-jesse.

Speaking of that branch, how do you want to handle it?  Is it intended for my 
linux-next branch or are some of the fixes important to get upstream now?  
Which branch should I diff/log against to see the changes (last time I looked 
it appeared neither master nor tip were the correct ones...)

Thanks,
Jesse
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/