Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756765AbYFJUaA (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:30:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752909AbYFJU3w (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:29:52 -0400 Received: from server009.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.130.17]:49690 "EHLO server009.webpack.hosteurope.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752078AbYFJU3v (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:29:51 -0400 From: Daniel Exner Reply-To: webmaster@dragonslave.de To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: linux-next Regression: Unable to locate IOAPIC Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:29:10 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org References: <200806051100.12885.dex@dragonslave.de> <200806061930.29046.dex@dragonslave.de> <20080606115024.387b5f80.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080606115024.387b5f80.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200806102229.10512.dex@dragonslave.de> X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;dex@dragonslave.de;1213129790;68fa08e7; Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1372 Lines: 42 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:30:28 +0200 Daniel Exner wrote: > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > (cc linux-acpi) > > > > > > On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:00:12 +0200 Daniel Exner wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > (Added myself to CC, because I'm not subscribed) > > > > > > > > with linux-next snapshot 20080604 my Laptop morphes into sitting duck > > > > and I think this is due to this: > > > > > > I assume 2.6.26-rc5 is OK? > > > > Indeed.. just tried it with (nearly) the same config: no unable to locate > > IOAPIC > > > > Will try todays next snapshot above -rc5 now. > > OK, thanks. > > It would be great if you could test 2.6.26-rc5 plus > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/git-acpi.patch. That'll allow us to > confirm that the regression is due to changes in the acpi tree. Sorry for the delay.. real-life you know ;) I guess you'd expect me to confirm the behavior on rc5 with this patch aplied, but .. well this Kernel works! So I think the regression is NOT in the acpi tree. Perhaps pci subsystem? If I find time I'll try bisecting it.. Greetings Daniel Exner -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/