Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755267AbYFJWFt (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:05:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754673AbYFJWFl (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:05:41 -0400 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.150]:55310 "EHLO e32.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754534AbYFJWFk (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:05:40 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 13/25] Noreclaim LRU Infrastructure From: Dave Hansen To: Andrew Morton Cc: Rik van Riel , clameter@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, eric.whitney@hp.com, Paul Mundt , Andi Kleen , Ingo Molnar , Andy Whitcroft In-Reply-To: <20080610143334.c53d7d8a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080606202838.390050172@redhat.com> <20080606202859.291472052@redhat.com> <20080606180506.081f686a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080608163413.08d46427@bree.surriel.com> <20080608135704.a4b0dbe1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080608173244.0ac4ad9b@bree.surriel.com> <20080608162208.a2683a6c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080608193420.2a9cc030@bree.surriel.com> <20080608165434.67c87e5c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080610153702.4019e042@cuia.bos.redhat.com> <20080610143334.c53d7d8a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:05:35 -0700 Message-Id: <1213135535.7261.10.camel@nimitz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1084 Lines: 25 On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 14:33 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Maybe it's time to bite the bullet and kill i386 NUMA support. afaik > it's just NUMAQ and a 2-node NUMAish machine which IBM made (as400?) Yeah, IBM sold a couple of these "interesting" 32-bit NUMA machines: https://www.redbooks.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/tips0267.html?Open I think those maxed out at 8 nodes, ever. But, no distro ever turned NUMA on for i386, so no one actually depends on it working. We do have a bunch of systems that we use for testing and so forth. It'd be a shame to make these suck *too* much. The NUMA-Q is probably also so intertwined with CONFIG_NUMA that we'd likely never get it running again. I'd rather just bloat page->flags on these platforms or move the sparsemem/zone/node bits elsewhere than kill NUMA support. -- Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/