Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755648AbYFKKqZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:46:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754700AbYFKKqD (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:46:03 -0400 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.31]:31331 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753918AbYFKKqA (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:46:00 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=pIKGCPnMXNRm9Km5Wh5JlSW7BxJjh2gcyz83eqtLA/P3OzZcjgkJDelAwgp2WpNZAp WFTT5hy8nwVObL/zCLYJgB+QGUxRmPvwHzW5nHxC4SH8Pur2NRSzllh7HOXghJAHmCuI Y6iK7UKlgL+3cQVtcqa7fP4oUoxYthEeii64A= Message-ID: <87a5b0800806110345v77529fc8r591f2fb4c95b5bdf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:45:55 +0100 From: "Will Newton" To: "Greg KH" Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-staging tree created Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, "Stephen Rothwell" In-Reply-To: <20080610190540.GA25066@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080610190540.GA25066@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1893 Lines: 38 On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Greg KH wrote: > This tree will be included in the daily linux-next builds, and will get > testing by all users of that tree. > > The rules of what can be included here is as follows: > - the code must be released under a Linux kernel-compatible > license > - the goal of the developers must be to merge this code into the > main kernel tree in the near future, but not for the next > kernel release. > - the code must build properly on the x86 platform > - this is not a tree for bugfixes or rewrites of existing kernel > code, this should be for new features, drivers, and > filesystems. > - the patches included must detail exactly what is needed to be > completed in order for them to be included into the main > kernel tree. > - there must be some email address associated with the patch > that can be used for bug reporting and questions about > cleanups and testing the code. > > What this tree is not: > - it is not a place to dump features that are being actively > developed by a community of people (reiserfs4 for example.) > - it is not a place to dump code and then run away, hoping that > someone else will do the cleanup work for you. While there > are developers available to do this kind of work, you need to > get someone to agree to "babysit" the code. Would the linux-staging tree be an appropriate place to merge a new architecture? Or would that be too large a change and should go via its own tree? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/