Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753244AbYFKURu (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:17:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751546AbYFKURk (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:17:40 -0400 Received: from g5t0006.atlanta.hp.com ([15.192.0.43]:1342 "EHLO g5t0006.atlanta.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751613AbYFKURj (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:17:39 -0400 To: Holger Kiehl Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel From: Nick Dokos Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Subject: Re: Performance of ext4 In-Reply-To: Message from Holger Kiehl of "Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:58:53 -0000." References: <20080611105945.GB9008@skywalker> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0.3; nmh 1.2; GNU Emacs 22.1.50 Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:17:37 -0400 Message-ID: <18563.1213215457@alphaville.zko.hp.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 656 Lines: 18 Holger Kiehl wrote: > Against a clean 2.6.26-rc5 the patchqueue does not apply. Lots of rejects. > The patchqueue also contains changes for defrag that are not in 2.6.26-rc5. > Or did you mean to apply those against the mm tree? > Just an FYI and a data point: I was able to apply the patch queue against 2.6.26-rc5 (after I set up quilt correctly) without any problems. Regards, Nick -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/