Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759568AbYFLLiO (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:38:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752061AbYFLLh7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:37:59 -0400 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.29]:54192 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751709AbYFLLh5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:37:57 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=xcwwsTbmEoLHZE1f0PZH+ic8mygw4N+4tmUNdQb2jvkO/ub/Yp6MlXOQTGYKmytpGQ LkAaJ9iLyrjO9/8oaEAuJCdCh2mmh4Luxke6yf2gPHyGL2ACBPIPCinzG5dt2M2KYk2d ZgSOV4GRgIsUh0BREY+5qh5T4y73cTQpjZbiE= Message-ID: <87a5b0800806120437n23602ba5raae500f5bd3d179f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:37:56 +0100 From: "Will Newton" To: "Greg KH" Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-staging tree created Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, "Stephen Rothwell" In-Reply-To: <20080611162639.GE22134@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080610190540.GA25066@kroah.com> <87a5b0800806110345v77529fc8r591f2fb4c95b5bdf@mail.gmail.com> <20080611162639.GE22134@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1073 Lines: 29 On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:45:55AM +0100, Will Newton wrote: >> >> Would the linux-staging tree be an appropriate place to merge a new >> architecture? Or would that be too large a change and should go via >> its own tree? > > That is probably too big to go into -staging and should deserve its own > tree based on the size of patches that have gone into creating a new > architecture in the past. Our tree is about 26000 lines of diff, including a few drivers. > Do you have an example of one that is currently not included in the main > kernel tree right now? I have a tree that is currently about half way to public consumption, although I don't think there's any point pushing it until we have a publically available toolchain. > thanks, > > greg k-h > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/