Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 06:57:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 06:57:48 -0500 Received: from smtpde03.sap-ag.de ([194.39.131.54]:44522 "EHLO smtpde03.sap-ag.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 06:57:39 -0500 From: Christoph Rohland To: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Why not "attach" patches? In-Reply-To: <005901c19dec$59a89e30$0201a8c0@HOMER> <3C446C77.3000806@evision-ventures.com> Organisation: SAP LinuxLab Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 12:46:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: (torvalds@transmeta.com's message of "Tue, 15 Jan 2002 18:04:40 +0000 (UTC)") Message-ID: Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence, i386-suse-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SAP: out X-SAP: out Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Linus, On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Wrong. > > If I get a patch in an attachment (other than a "Text/PLAIN" type > attachment with no mangling and that pretty much all mail readers > and all tools will see as a normal body), So text/plain is ok for you? How about multiple cummulative patches attached to one mail? This is the case where I hate your strategy about attachments: You want to have separate patches (what I clearly understand), but you do not want attachments. That's fine most of the time as long as I send it to you privately, but to public lists too many people miss the important steps. Greetings Christoph - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/