Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 10:28:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 10:28:24 -0500 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:22538 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 10:28:18 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 10:27:33 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Davidsen To: Daniel Phillips cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On January 15, 2002 06:26 am, Mark Hahn wrote: > > > than the task's float, the completion time of the schedule as a whole will be > > > delayed. This is no different for a computer than it is for a group of > > > people, it is still a scheduling problem. Delaying any random task risks > > > > it is quite different. with computers, there are often STRONG benefits > > to clustering, batching, chunking, piggybacking, whatever you want to call it. > > It's no different. Sorry, there are strong benefits from all of the things mentioned. I lack time and inclination to explain how caching works, but there are costs of changing from one thing to another. The other issue is that processes doing i/o (blocking before a whole timeslice) will run better if they get priority when they can use the CPU. Therefore a system needs to recognize (and be tuned) for both of these. Computers are very different than people in lines. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/