Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759621AbYFMMRO (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:17:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754990AbYFMMQ6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:16:58 -0400 Received: from ecfrec.frec.bull.fr ([129.183.4.8]:35017 "EHLO ecfrec.frec.bull.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754472AbYFMMQ5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:16:57 -0400 Message-ID: <4852654D.9060306@bull.net> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:17:17 +0200 From: Benjamin Thery User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] sysfs tagged directories V5 References: <20080606154654.356185262@theryb.frec.bull.fr> <20080610225024.GB22478@us.ibm.com> <20080610230058.GA25072@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20080610230058.GA25072@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1615 Lines: 52 Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 05:50:24PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: >> Quoting Benjamin Thery (benjamin.thery@bull.net): >>> Greg, >>> >>> Here is an updated version of the sysfs tagged directories that improves >>> a bit the situation over the previous one. >>> [...] >>> >>> The generic part can be merge with patch 05 ("sysfs: Implement sysfs >>> tagged directory support.") but I left it separate for now to ease >>> reviews. >> Thanks. Not nearly as radical as I'd feared. >> >> Greg, does this address your concern? It stops the need to put any >> non-braindead code (i.e. the _exit notifier stuff) in fs/sysfs/mount.c for >> any new namespaces needing sysfs tagging, leaving only simple >> comparison/assignments. > > Sorry, I've been swamped with other things this week and haven't gotten > a chance to look this over. Hopefully by the end of the week... It's > in my queue though, don't worry it will not get lost. Greg, I've ported the patchset to 2.6.26-rc5-mm3 yesterday and I have just finished testing it. Will this help you if I send you an up-to-date tarball with this new version? or is it fine for you to review the patchset I sent last week (based on 2.6.26-rc2-mm1)? Tell me what you prefer. Benjamin > > thanks, > > greg k-h > > -- B e n j a m i n T h e r y - BULL/DT/Open Software R&D http://www.bull.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/