Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 12:32:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 12:30:55 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:41739 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 12:30:22 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 18:30:20 +0100 From: Dave Jones To: Jamie Lokier Cc: Alan Cox , Richard Henderson , Ronald Wahl , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Q] Looking for an emulation for CMOV* instructions. Message-ID: <20020116183020.A12977@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Jamie Lokier , Alan Cox , Richard Henderson , Ronald Wahl , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020111141850.A9873@twiddle.net> <20020116151852.B31993@kushida.apsleyroad.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020116151852.B31993@kushida.apsleyroad.org>; from lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk on Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 03:18:52PM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 03:18:52PM +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote: > > > What's the point of optimizing an IF to a cmov if I have > > > to insert another IF to see if I can use cmov? > > I've always wondered. Intel made the instruction optional yet there isnt > > an obvious way to do runtime fixups on it > Yes there is -- emulation! :-) Too much overhead to be of practical use.. -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/