Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757302AbYFNLSw (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2008 07:18:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751295AbYFNLSk (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2008 07:18:40 -0400 Received: from smtp5.pp.htv.fi ([213.243.153.39]:44050 "EHLO smtp5.pp.htv.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752861AbYFNLSL (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2008 07:18:11 -0400 Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:18:06 +0300 From: Adrian Bunk To: Alessandro Zummo Cc: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, david-b@pacbell.net, Ingo Molnar , Lior Dotan , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [Bug 10866] /dev/rtc was missing until I disabled CONFIG_RTC_CLASS Message-ID: <20080614111806.GF1716@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> References: <200806131343.41213.david-b@pacbell.net> <20080613210257.GA529@elte.hu> <200806131538.54254.david-b@pacbell.net> <20080614113535.4d611e07@i1501.lan.towertech.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080614113535.4d611e07@i1501.lan.towertech.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2200 Lines: 56 On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 11:35:35AM +0200, Alessandro Zummo wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:38:54 -0700 > David Brownell wrote: > > > They can continue working just fine with *only* the legacy RTC. > > If they stuck with defaults, no problems appear. (Modulo the > > fact that bitrot is setting in.) > > > > The only thing that causes the least hiccup is someone who was > > for a while using a bogus (and non-default) configuration. > > > > Given a bogus configuration, how should it be fixed? There > > can be several solutions, and the right answer for one system > > will always be the right one for another. So any approach > > that doesn't expect a human to select options sometimes will > > be inherently wrong in various cases. > > I agree with david. oldconfig cannot be made to fix every possible > manual misconfiguration that has been introduced by the user, even > those that, by chance, just worked. > > The actual Kconfig will handle pretty well the transition from > a good config. where good is different from working-by-chance. > > There are far too many people that just keep pressing Y > when a new kernel option appears without even considering what would > happen or reading the help. If Lior's problem was due to something like CONFIG_RTC_CLASS=y, CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS=n that's a kernel configuration that would anyway break when the old driver gets removed, and it just broke earlier. Everyone seems to focus on this kconfig related case, what about my point of no /dev/rtc with a static /dev ? When talking about existing setups and embedded systems that's a real issue for some systems. > Best regards, > > Alessandro Zummo, cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/