Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756275AbYFOGPD (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jun 2008 02:15:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751390AbYFOGOz (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jun 2008 02:14:55 -0400 Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com ([66.249.90.177]:3822 "EHLO ik-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751316AbYFOGOx (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jun 2008 02:14:53 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; b=n0y+lpcTJIs4SqPeVX8JLfnqTUwPT1cLOLa4+vgxJGKWEx0dVOUIuS9puPJZFoDl4H eBzLOMEs9SnP+SyqJ32pc0DS6Vcp/G+agoZ4XBCX6LsxL26CQ18vHEcczPZKegVTbUfM 4OKnhrh/IAYIhhuuTzM7hnrYhSlYxMN8fef7c= From: Chris Clayton Reply-To: chris2553@googlemail.com To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [Bug 10861] 2.6.26-rc4-git2 - long pause during boot Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 06:12:17 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Hannes Reinecke" , "James Bottomley" , "Kay Sievers" References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200806150612.17215.chris2553@googlemail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1216 Lines: 32 On Saturday 14 June 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10861 > Subject : 2.6.26-rc4-git2 - long pause during boot > Submitter : Chris Clayton > Date : 2008-06-01 4:15 (14 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121229382917834&w=4 Well, we know how to create (and to avoid) the problem. Since the original patch adversely affects existing user space, it could be argued that it is a regression, but I see that there is a counter argument that the udev rule that triggers the problem is quite simply a bad rule. I'll leave to those more closely concerned that rule on that. Thanks Chris -- Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/