Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757230AbYFOIyy (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jun 2008 04:54:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756605AbYFOIyo (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jun 2008 04:54:44 -0400 Received: from mail01a.mail.t-online.hu ([84.2.40.6]:51596 "EHLO mail01a.mail.t-online.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756581AbYFOIyn (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jun 2008 04:54:43 -0400 X-Authuid: nmarci Message-ID: <4854D8C8.8080006@freemail.hu> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:54:32 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?N=E9meth_M=E1rton?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070221 SeaMonkey/1.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [Bug 10864] [regression][bisected] ~90,000 wakeups as of 2.6.26-rc3 References: <4854B71D.9080801@freemail.hu> <20080615075008.GD29552@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20080615075008.GD29552@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-DCC--Metrics: mail01a.mail.t-online.hu 0; Body=3 Fuz1=3 Fuz2=3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2008 Lines: 48 Ingo Molnar wrote: > * N?meth M?rton wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I already mentioned at the bug report that 2.6.26-rc6 this is fixed. >> >> Maybe tell your robot to first check the latest activities in the bug >> report since the last -rc release. What I want also to tell your robot >> that it should mention what actions should be taken in case the bug >> should be still listed or when the bug can be closed. > > i think the current regression tracking methods that Rafael uses work > very well and i'd like to thank Rafael for those efforts - to me as a > subsystem maintainer it is a _very_ useful thing. > > In this case there was no real harm from the "this bug is already fixed" > condition - just an extra email. Real harm would only come from missed > regressions or from incorrectly closed regressions - but those are not > happening. > > note that there is no "robot" involved in changing the state of bugs - > the real important work here is done by Rafael and checking whether a > bug is still relevant is an inevitably manual work. The mails and > reports are auto-generated but crawling discussions and determining the > status of a regression is very hard to automate. Sorry, I thought a robot missed my comments in the bug tracking system for the second time: 1. Comment was on 2008-06-06 13:27:16 ( http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10864#c3 ) The mail was coming: 7 Jun 2008 22:42:57 +0200 (CEST) ( http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/7/193 ) 2. Comment was on 2008-06-13 23:19:53 ( http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10864#c4 ) The mail was coming: 14 Jun 2008 22:12:04 +0200 (CEST) ( http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/14/160 ) Nevertheless the bug #10864 can be closed I think. Regards, M?rton N?meth -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/