Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:31:42 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Divyesh Shah <dpshah@google.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][RESEND] Fix the starving writes bug in the anticipatory IO scheduler
Message-ID: <20080616163142.GL20851@kernel.dk>
References: <935894B7-5FD4-4C3D-9A74-6B18E532462B@google.com> <200806161318.57435.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200806161318.57435.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 738
Lines: 21

On Mon, Jun 16 2008, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Well, thanks for the report and test case. I'm a bit out of the
> loop when it comes to IO scheduling these days, however the fix
> seems good to me.
> 
> Does google still use AS scheduling? This doesn't introduce any
> performance regressions that you can tell?
> 
> Andrew might be away this week I think. Jens, any chance you can
> pick this up and get it merged when you feel it is ready?

It looks good to me, I'll queue it up.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/