Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758983AbYFPWwg (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:52:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756032AbYFPWwY (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:52:24 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:49480 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757575AbYFPWwY (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:52:24 -0400 Message-ID: <4856EE79.1000205@goop.org> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:51:37 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: the arch/x86 maintainers , Stable Kernel , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH 2/2] xen: don't drop NX bit References: <4856E2D4.3020402@goop.org> <20080616223508.GA1165@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20080616223508.GA1165@kroah.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 805 Lines: 22 Greg KH wrote: > While it's great that you tell the stable people about this, but is it > realistic? Is anyone using Xen as contained in the mainline kernel > these days? > Yes, it's what Redhat is shipping in Fedora 9. > If a distro were to be based on 2.6.25 and we take this patch, they will > just revert it back out due to their very large Xen patchset they apply > on top to get a "working" Xen version, right? > No. RH is using upstream Xen now. I don't know what the other distros are doing, but Novell is considering it, at least. J -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/