Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757362AbYFQIoQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 04:44:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754382AbYFQIoB (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 04:44:01 -0400 Received: from smtp6.pp.htv.fi ([213.243.153.40]:58105 "EHLO smtp6.pp.htv.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754078AbYFQIn7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 04:43:59 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:42:35 +0300 From: Adrian Bunk To: David Woodhouse Cc: Peter Korsgaard , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravnborg.org, dhowells@redhat.com, andi@firstfloor.org, "Kirill A. Shutemov" , ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, takata@linux-m32r.org, linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org, kyle@mcmartin.ca, matthew@wil.cx, grundler@parisc-linux.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, lethal@linux-sh.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org Subject: architectures with ARCH_SUPPORTS_AOUT but no binfmt_aout Message-ID: <20080617084235.GA20169@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> References: <1213565555.26255.522.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <1213604973-7073-1-git-send-email-jacmet@sunsite.dk> <1213617663.26255.708.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20080616121727.GB10854@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <1213619214.26255.721.camel@pmac.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1213619214.26255.721.camel@pmac.infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1600 Lines: 47 On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 01:26:54PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: >... > Actually, I think we can drop the preceding patch too -- it's not > necessary to fix the regression in 2.6.26, and dhowells suggests that we > might still want to use ARCH_SUPPORTS_AOUT, by making BINFMT_AOUT depend > on it instead of that hard-coded list of architectures. > > If we do that, then ARCH_SUPPORTS_AOUT would need to be defined on a > different set of architectures to the ones it's currently defined on -- > so I don't really want to go there before 2.6.26. I'll push just the > parts which were included in the mail I just sent. > > Why _are_ there architectures which define ARCH_SUPPORTS_AOUT and have > but don't support binfmt_aout, anyway? How does that make > sense? My guess would be that binfmt_aout isn't actually used there. The affected architectures are: - h8300 - m32r - parisc - sh - v850 v850 is broken beyond repair, and I hope my patch to remove the architecture will make it into 2.6.27. For the other 4 architectures I have Cc'ed the architecture maintainers. > dwmw2 cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/