Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756178AbYFQKMr (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:12:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753730AbYFQKMi (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:12:38 -0400 Received: from smtp6.pp.htv.fi ([213.243.153.40]:38599 "EHLO smtp6.pp.htv.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752612AbYFQKMg (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:12:36 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:11:12 +0300 From: Adrian Bunk To: David Woodhouse Cc: Peter Korsgaard , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravnborg.org, dhowells@redhat.com, andi@firstfloor.org, "Kirill A. Shutemov" , ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, takata@linux-m32r.org, linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org, kyle@mcmartin.ca, matthew@wil.cx, grundler@parisc-linux.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, lethal@linux-sh.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: architectures with ARCH_SUPPORTS_AOUT but no binfmt_aout Message-ID: <20080617101112.GE20169@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> References: <1213565555.26255.522.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <1213604973-7073-1-git-send-email-jacmet@sunsite.dk> <1213617663.26255.708.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20080616121727.GB10854@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <1213619214.26255.721.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20080617084235.GA20169@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <1213696004.26255.960.camel@pmac.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1213696004.26255.960.camel@pmac.infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1825 Lines: 54 On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:46:44AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 11:42 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > > Why _are_ there architectures which define ARCH_SUPPORTS_AOUT and have > > > but don't support binfmt_aout, anyway? How does that make > > > sense? > > > > My guess would be that binfmt_aout isn't actually used there. > > > > The affected architectures are: > > - h8300 > > - m32r > > - parisc > > - sh > > - v850 > > > > v850 is broken beyond repair, and I hope my patch to remove the > > architecture will make it into 2.6.27. > > > > For the other 4 architectures I have Cc'ed the architecture maintainers. > > There's another set of architectures which have but don't > define ARCH_SUPPORTS_AOUT. Including PowerPC. > > I think we can probably get away with removing from every > architecture other than Alpha, ARM, m68k and x86, and killing > ARCH_SUPPORTS_AOUT completely. include/linux/a.out.h contains an #include and is exported to userspace... > Or maybe, as dhowells suggests, re-defining ARCH_SUPPORTS_AOUT to be set > only on Alpha, ARM, m68k and x86 (so BINFMT_AOUT can depend on it). The pattern for this stuff is to provide a HAVE_AOUT kconfig variable that gets select'ed by these architectures. > dwmw2 cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/