Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758507AbYFQRDG (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:03:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755125AbYFQRCx (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:02:53 -0400 Received: from fxip-0047f.externet.hu ([88.209.222.127]:57321 "EHLO pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754920AbYFQRCx (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:02:53 -0400 To: szaka@ntfs-3g.org CC: miklos@szeredi.hu, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ywang221@hotmail.com In-reply-to: (message from Szabolcs Szakacsits on Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:59:15 +0300 (EEST)) Subject: Re: [2.6.26 patch] fuse: fix thinko in max I/O size calucation References: Message-Id: From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:02:19 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 742 Lines: 19 > > From: Miklos Szeredi > > > > Use max not min to enforce a lower limit on the max I/O size. > > Big write is ok now, thanks. NTFS-3G in-memory write performance seems to > be 6x better on a T9300 and quick tests seem to show that it's at least as > fast as ext3 in-memory writes (but this needs more testing, etc). > > However the max write size seems to be limited to 128kB. Is this > intentional? Yes, that's due to another limit (max 32 pages per request). Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/