Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759264AbYFQRzr (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:55:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755474AbYFQRzk (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:55:40 -0400 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50511 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753186AbYFQRzj (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:55:39 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:54:14 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Ingo Molnar Cc: David Miller , arjan@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linville@tuxdriver.com, davej@redhat.com Subject: Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008 Message-ID: <20080617175414.GA9866@suse.de> References: <4856AFDF.5080901@linux.intel.com> <20080617092023.GA20621@elte.hu> <20080617.022652.76635616.davem@davemloft.net> <20080617153356.GA3510@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080617153356.GA3510@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1498 Lines: 36 On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 05:33:56PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > IMO we are not learning and are repeating history once again, as the > Nouveau situation is building up towards a similar "we didnt merge it in > time" pain point. From kernel-2.6.25.6-24.fc8.src.rpm: > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 513639 2008-05-22 04:31 nouveau-drm.patch > > 39 files changed, 13960 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > Nouveau has been started in 2006, about two years ago. It's a lot less > painful (not the least it is a lot faster as well) if such things are > developed gradually in mainline. Not to dispute your original claim of wanting to merge drivers earlier, but a lot of the time, there are good reasons why the code doesn't get merged. As recently pointed out by the nouveau driver authors on the xorg mailing list, they don't want the driver to be added to the main kernel.org tree yet as they feel that their userspace/kernelspace inteface is not complete and will change in the future. We try to respect the authors of the code when not including them into the kernel tree for situations like this :) As for why Fedora added it, it might be because they can control both sides of the boundry with matching packages much easier. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/