Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760698AbYFQX0p (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:26:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758952AbYFQX0i (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:26:38 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.248]:10189 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756612AbYFQX0h (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:26:37 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=ANG6GndK/qj0olet/IKjfSwNZJXnIQSUHLfeYANQaebI7dO4RVJCefqwWM1p8rVskz kXL+QrAOCTFolI+O4UrOjga9di+NirGOdNs3CDmcHKEh+HF8tDfw4b2zy9I2f81beQm5 mLQgasERMdZOfE8IMX/PansWZRsk6c8FiQXXE= Message-ID: <72dbd3150806171626q1b8ebf54g931424b8deec5e7a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:26:36 -0700 From: "David Rees" To: mperkel@yahoo.com Subject: Re: AMD Dual Core vs. Quad - Power Management Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <364301.54904.qm@web52506.mail.re2.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <364301.54904.qm@web52506.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1466 Lines: 33 On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Marc Perkel wrote: > Been running a few tests and an AMD motherboard booting 2.6.25 from > flash uses 0.33 amps if the CPU is a AM2 Athlon 6000. But if I used a > Phenom Quad core CPU 9550 it pulls 0.55 amps. > > In theory the 9550 should pull less because it's a lower TPD and the > phenom processor is supposed to be smarter about power management. > > So - why is the Phenom pulling more power? Is it because power > management software for the Phenom isn't updated yet? At idle with CoolNQuiet on, all AMD processors seem to pull close to the same amount of power, varying between 7-11 watts. Except for the quad core processors, which pull significantly more at idle w/CnQ on than dual and single core processors. Tom's hardware has a nice chart listing power consumption here, all his testing was done under Windows. His tests show the Phenom pulling about twice the power of the Athlon64 X2 6000+ which matches up pretty closely to your numbers. http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-power-cpu,1925-7.html Sounds like a question for AMD. The Phenoms seem to be pretty good except for the extra 10-11w of power draw at idle which is disappointing. -Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/