Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760215AbYFQXsY (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:48:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752926AbYFQXsQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:48:16 -0400 Received: from web52512.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([206.190.48.195]:20709 "HELO web52512.mail.re2.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751828AbYFQXsP (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:48:15 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=OWFhA3+ELBmibGP27WRRoXHVll8zF51ebRs3gHpxUgeGw5DjgHzOC37SzW3L4aP6UmT9H79PleuvbVQPFBw7fRf+/XyhXGLalo5e6oz89ktU9Uw0i64I6uctIGqU73cIPlhPfH5MK9RSZIqXMf4n8I436/HCmlFIAEFvqKkSZ6w=; X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.199 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:48:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Marc Perkel Reply-To: mperkel@yahoo.com Subject: Re: AMD Dual Core vs. Quad - Power Management To: David Rees Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <72dbd3150806171626q1b8ebf54g931424b8deec5e7a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <679566.97158.qm@web52512.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1963 Lines: 67 Marc Perkel Junk Email Filter dot com http://www.junkemailfilter.com --- On Tue, 6/17/08, David Rees wrote: > From: David Rees > Subject: Re: AMD Dual Core vs. Quad - Power Management > To: mperkel@yahoo.com > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2008, 4:26 PM > On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Marc Perkel > wrote: > > Been running a few tests and an AMD motherboard > booting 2.6.25 from > > flash uses 0.33 amps if the CPU is a AM2 Athlon 6000. > But if I used a > > Phenom Quad core CPU 9550 it pulls 0.55 amps. > > > > In theory the 9550 should pull less because it's a > lower TPD and the > > phenom processor is supposed to be smarter about power > management. > > > > So - why is the Phenom pulling more power? Is it > because power > > management software for the Phenom isn't updated > yet? > > At idle with CoolNQuiet on, all AMD processors seem to pull > close to > the same amount of power, varying between 7-11 watts. > Except for the > quad core processors, which pull significantly more at idle > w/CnQ on > than dual and single core processors. > > Tom's hardware has a nice chart listing power > consumption here, all > his testing was done under Windows. His tests show the > Phenom pulling > about twice the power of the Athlon64 X2 6000+ which > matches up pretty > closely to your numbers. > > http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-power-cpu,1925-7.html > > Sounds like a question for AMD. The Phenoms seem to be > pretty good > except for the extra 10-11w of power draw at idle which is > disappointing. > > -Dave Thanks - that definitely answered my question. And I'm using b3 stepping. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/