Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754142AbYFRJ6x (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:58:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753322AbYFRJ6h (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:58:37 -0400 Received: from ns1.q-leap.de ([153.94.51.193]:54967 "EHLO mail.q-leap.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752536AbYFRJ6f (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:58:35 -0400 From: Bernd Schubert To: Nikola Ciprich , Jesse Subject: Re: [regression?] e1000e breaks IPMI Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:58:34 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-netdev@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200806181158.34412.bs@q-leap.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 788 Lines: 22 > I hate working around this broken BMC (again) when others are known to > work just fine, and CRC stripping in hardware really simplifies our > receive path. Due to rather bad experiences I'm always alarmed about IPMI problems (actually so far not with supermicro, but with other vendors). So I contacted supermicro and immediately got an answer they have a new LAP EEPROM to fix this problem. So the problem with supermicro is solved, lets see what the other vendor, I also contacted, says. -- Bernd Schubert Q-Leap Networks GmbH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/