Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:55:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:55:40 -0500 Received: from mailhost.teleline.es ([195.235.113.141]:30500 "EHLO tsmtp1.mail.isp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:55:29 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 22:59:26 +0100 From: Diego Calleja To: Andrea Arcangeli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Rik spreading bullshit about VM Reply-To: grundig@teleline.es In-Reply-To: <20020116200459.E835@athlon.random> In-Reply-To: <20020116200459.E835@athlon.random> X-Mailer: Spruce 0.7.4 for X11 w/smtpio 0.8.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <20020116215533Z289135-13997+6272@vger.kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > attached) and most important I don't have a single bugreport about the > current 2.4.18pre2aa2 VM (except perhaps the bdflush wakeup that seems > to be a little too late and that deals to lower numbers with slow write > load etc.., fixable with bdflush tuning). Mainline VM kills too easily, Well, I haven't reported it yet, but booting my box with mem=4M gave as result: (running 2.4.18-pre2aa2): diego# cat /var/log/messages | grep gfp Jan 13 15:37:10 localhost kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0xf0/0) Jan 15 16:06:28 localhost kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0xf0/0) Jan 15 18:37:21 localhost kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0xf0/0) Jan 15 21:58:32 localhost kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0xf0/0) Jan 15 21:58:33 localhost kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0xf0/0) diego# Each script of /etc/rc.d was killed by VM when it was started, there wasn't any "OOM", just "VM killed..." or something similar. As /etc/rc.d scripts were killed, I couldn't start swap. The gfp=0x... numbers were not always the same, but I can't remember them because syslogd wasn't running. I can repeat this if you want and I'll copy all messages. ..I remember running 2.2.14 in a 386 box with 4MB of RAM and 8 or 16 of swap. It was veeery slow, but even I could run apache :-)... > this is fixed in -aa VM and -aa VM has a number of other issues > resolved, but mainline 2.4 vm isn't that far either. In the last few > days I was playing with pte-highmem, soon I will spend some time merging > -aa VM into mainline with Marcelo if he likes to. > > Andrea > > PS. I know the interviewer and he's usually very accurate, so I don't > think this could be a misunderstanding where you say one thing and they > writer another one just to create troubles. > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/