Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 17:45:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 17:44:54 -0500 Received: from chabotc.xs4all.nl ([213.84.192.197]:60033 "EHLO chabotc.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 17:44:38 -0500 Message-ID: <3C460255.4020805@reviewboard.com> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 23:44:37 +0100 From: Chris Chabot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20020115 X-Accept-Language: en,nl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrea Arcangeli CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rik van Riel Subject: Re: Rik spreading bullshit about VM In-Reply-To: <20020116200459.E835@athlon.random> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Test hardware: > 4 way Dell, 4 GB physical RAM, SCSI/RAID subsystem, > DB runs on FS. Can we first make sure that the other factors dont plat a rol in this benchmark? I have a couple (14+) Dell servers here, and i know for a fact that most of their RAID systems are heavely borked in the performance department. All kernels upto 2.4.1x performed horibly, and all kernels after 2.4.16 or so perform horibly again! Somewhere inbetween some magic seemed to happen in the block layer / elevator code / etc, that caused performance to increase upto 100% on the Dell PERC adapters. (started @ the first release of the AA VM). However after a few small releases, the performance went down to the same old horible level again. So it might well be (very likely actualy) that the tested redhat 2.4.14 is a performance 'sweet spot' kernel, where kernels < 2.4.13 and > 2.4.15 or 16 are definatly not. The raid performance is a whole issue on its self. part seems to be block IO / Elevator / driver related, and a part seems to be adapter firmware related. (And adaptec refusing to release their drivers). However since both 2.4.17 and 2.4.7 have the same horible RAID performance, i do not think the VM is responcible for that part ;-) A good test would be to configure those disks on a normal AIC7xxx adapter, and software raiding them together. The performance of that is 'equal' between those different kernels, and much much higher then the hardware raid. Benchmarking with this would give much better results for benchmarking VM's -- Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/