Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757518AbYFSHCN (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2008 03:02:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755655AbYFSHB4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2008 03:01:56 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.249]:61130 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753347AbYFSHBz (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2008 03:01:55 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=vqzqVlEgf1WIi0CpMQm1uXiumbd1nc/wC5PcqvH3F7TGp6HenzdKSEZFP+7c2ACeIK puaNLk8VBWPxr9asUpfa0HwWfStCbf+kUZbNB+vH8RenUJ1pAaD30UL0+ihWTErbYYpt 78UFYNGvqqQj0xwt4mfenDuXVQzYw4Xo0cUlA= Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:06:08 +0000 From: Jarek Poplawski To: David Miller Cc: auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com, vgusev@openvz.org, jeff@garzik.org, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl, arjan@linux.intel.com, mcmanus@ducksong.com, ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, mingo@elte.hu, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, xemul@openvz.org Subject: Re: [TCP]: TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT causes leak sockets Message-ID: <20080619070608.GA4150@ff.dom.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080618.151224.211093487.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1123 Lines: 39 On 19-06-2008 00:12, David Miller wrote: > From: "Kok, Auke" > Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:25:28 -0700 > >> You only complain and do not provide a single solution to your >> problem. Technically, Ingo has asked for a solution (but btw. he gave some proposal), so this argument is wrong. >> Your continued screaming and whining is totally not >> productive nor constructive at all, Actually, screaming and whining often "helps" to have things done, so this argument is wrong too. >> and frankly is insulting This one is right. >> since >> you completely ignore the fact that we worked with the the community >> more than two-year to come to some maintainable situation. Two-year work doesn't guarantee the solution is right (but it might be right),so - wrong argument. > > I completely and %100 agree with you. I give 25... Regards, Jarek P. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/