Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757046AbYFSKbm (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2008 06:31:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755243AbYFSKbe (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2008 06:31:34 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:32916 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755290AbYFSKbd (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2008 06:31:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:30:51 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Cliff Wickman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, the arch/x86 maintainers Subject: Re: [PATCHv5] SGI UV: TLB shootdown using broadcast assist unit - v5 delta Message-ID: <20080619103051.GH15228@elte.hu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1620 Lines: 46 * Cliff Wickman wrote: > From: Cliff Wickman > > TLB shootdown for SGI UV. > > This patch brings the code in Ingo's latest (June 18,2008) to v5 > > v1: 6/2 original > v2: 6/3 corrections/improvements per Ingo's review > v3: 6/4 split atomic operations off to a separate patch (Jeremy's review) > v4: 6/12 include rather than > (fixes a !SMP build problem) > fix the index on uv_table_bases[blade] > v5: 6/18 corrections/improvements per Ingo's second and third reviews > (includes closing the security hole in uv_ptc_proc_write()) > (and adds tlb_uv.o to the Makefile) > > Diffed against 2.6.26-rc6 could you please send a delta patch against tip/x86/uv - or just tip/master? You can pick it all up from: http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README it's better to have all these delta patches in a consecutive way, as everything up to your previous version of v5 has already been tested pretty thoroughly on non-UV hardware and is ready to be pushed into linux-next. I'd suggest you name the new delta patch as v6, as there's a "v5" patch applied already. ( Also, you might want to check whether tip/master properly works on your simulator - to double-check whether the integration of x86/uv changes with other x86 changes went fine. ) Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/