Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756707AbYFSLHL (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:07:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757916AbYFSLGe (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:06:34 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:37288 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758014AbYFSLGd (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:06:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 04:04:18 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Atsushi Nemoto Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, David Woodhouse , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH] jedec_probe: Fix SST 16-bit chip detection Message-ID: <20080619110418.GB27196@kroah.com> References: <20080619.163648.262833678.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080619.163648.262833678.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1013 Lines: 27 On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 04:36:48PM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > The unlock_addr rework in kernel 2.6.25 breaks 16-bit SST chips. SST > 39LF160 and SST 39VF1601 are both 16-bit only chip and new uaddr value > is not correct for them. Add MTD_UADDR_0xAAAA_0x5555 for those chips. > Tested with SST 39VF1601 chip. > > Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto In the future, if you want something to go into the stable tree, just add: cc: stable to the signed-off-by area of the patch and we will be automatically notifed when it goes into Linus's tree and will then add it to the -stable tree. Otherwise it's a pain to try to track when a patch goes into mainline. Can you notify us when this patch is accepted? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/