Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757995AbYFSP2X (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:28:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751839AbYFSP2O (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:28:14 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:54824 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750975AbYFSP2N (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:28:13 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,673,1204531200"; d="scan'208";a="399508338" Message-ID: <485A7AF4.4080307@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:27:48 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Bunk CC: Dave Airlie , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: kerneloops.org: 2.6.26-rc possible regression in ext3 References: <4859F075.2050207@linux.intel.com> <21d7e9970806182242na130e47i85839c4550b4ba03@mail.gmail.com> <20080619081146.GC17630@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <485A61B5.90003@linux.intel.com> <20080619151016.GA2721@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <485A78CF.7050401@linux.intel.com> <20080619152500.GB2721@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> In-Reply-To: <20080619152500.GB2721@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1179 Lines: 28 Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 08:18:39AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >> Adrian Bunk wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 06:40:05AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >>>> Adrian Bunk wrote: >>>>> Expect a lot more of this to pop up in the future. >>>>> Should we #error for gcc 4.3.1? >>>> it/s better to find if the gcc guys made a testcase for this bug (they normally do) and >>>> test based on that. >>> The gcc Bugzilla contains a testcase. >>> >>> But how do you plan to integrate it into a kernel build? >> we already have several of these. >> Just look at scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh for an example of such a beast. > > Checking whether gcc supports some flags is easy. have you actually looked at this script? You didn't, since the script doesn't check if gcc supports some flag. It checks very specifically for a code generation pattern... Please go look at the script first before responding. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/