Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 03:19:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 03:19:15 -0500 Received: from smtpde02.sap-ag.de ([194.39.131.53]:65479 "EHLO smtpde02.sap-ag.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 03:19:09 -0500 From: Christoph Rohland To: Chris Chabot Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rik van Riel Subject: Re: Rik spreading bullshit about VM In-Reply-To: <20020116200459.E835@athlon.random> <3C460255.4020805@reviewboard.com> Organisation: SAP LinuxLab Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:18:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <3C460255.4020805@reviewboard.com> (Chris Chabot's message of "Wed, 16 Jan 2002 23:44:37 +0100") Message-ID: Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090005 (Oort Gnus v0.05) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence, i386-suse-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SAP: out X-SAP: out X-SAP: out Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Chris, On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Chris Chabot wrote: > >> Test hardware: >> 4 way Dell, 4 GB physical RAM, SCSI/RAID subsystem, >> DB runs on FS. > > Can we first make sure that the other factors dont plat a rol in > this benchmark? I have a couple (14+) Dell servers here, and i know > for a fact that most of their RAID systems are heavely borked in the > performance department. We run these tests regularly on different hardware - We have hardware from Compaq, Dell, HP, IBM and FSC. All tests so far showed the same overall performance tendencies. Greetings Christoph - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/