Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 10:54:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 10:54:46 -0500 Received: from hybrid-024-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net ([24.221.152.185]:14323 "EHLO opus.bloom.county") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 10:54:33 -0500 Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 08:23:24 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Alexander Viro Cc: Gregory Maxwell , Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, bernds@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com Subject: Re: gcc 2.95.2 is buggy Message-ID: <20001124082324.A872@opus.bloom.county> In-Reply-To: <20001123233454.B27831@xi.linuxpower.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from viro@math.psu.edu on Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 11:47:04PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 11:47:04PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote: > > > On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 02:57:45AM +0100, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote: > > > but in the meantime there is good confirmation. > > > This really is a bug in gcc 2.95.2. > > > > ... RedHat's GCC snapshot "2.96" handles this case just fine. > > Now, if you can isolate the relevant part of the diff between 2.95.2 and > RH 2.96... Well, now that there is a testcase, has anyone sent this on to the relevant gcc lists? (The CCs I saw haven't) -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/