Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S288716AbSAQNms>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 08:42:48 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S288731AbSAQNmj>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 08:42:39 -0500
Received: from rogue.ncsl.nist.gov ([129.6.101.41]:36500 "EHLO
	rogue.ncsl.nist.gov") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S288716AbSAQNm1>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 08:42:27 -0500
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [lkml] Re: Rik spreading bullshit about VM
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0201161917060.32617-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
From: Ian Soboroff <ian.soboroff@nist.gov>
Date: 17 Jan 2002 08:42:26 -0500
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0201161917060.32617-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
Message-ID: <9cfpu49qekd.fsf@rogue.ncsl.nist.gov>
Lines: 20
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br> writes:

> It seems the IRC log of the journalist in question was missing
> some lines of what I said and he just glued together the remaining
> parts of the paragraph for that particular question ;)

It also looked to me like Rik was talking about the mainline VM, not
any VM that exists in the many not-yet-integrated -aa patchsets.

The argument always feels to me like:

Joe Luser: "I downloaded a 2.4 kernel and boy does the VM bite!"  

AA: "That's not true at all, but you need to apply these thirteen -aa
     patches from my site."  

Joe Luser: <runs away in fear>

ian

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/