Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:17:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:17:21 -0500 Received: from penguin.e-mind.com ([195.223.140.120]:18970 "EHLO penguin.e-mind.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:17:12 -0500 Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:17:45 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Adam Kropelin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rik van Riel Subject: async buffer flushing reported slowdown (could be a driver issue?) Message-ID: <20020117151745.H4847@athlon.random> In-Reply-To: <20020116200459.E835@athlon.random> <056c01c19ed4$f0e77300$02c8a8c0@kroptech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i In-Reply-To: <056c01c19ed4$f0e77300$02c8a8c0@kroptech.com>; from akropel1@rochester.rr.com on Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 04:29:54PM -0500 X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 04:29:54PM -0500, Adam Kropelin wrote: > Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > >I don't have a single bugreport about the current 2.4.18pre2aa2 VM (except > >perhaps the bdflush wakeup that seems to be a little too late and that deals to > >lower numbers with slow write load etc.., fixable with bdflush tuning). > > I don't know if this is a reference to the issue I reported under the "Writeout in > recent kernels..." thread or not. If not, my apologies for clogging up this new > "discussion". yes, I was thinking about you report. > > As reported[0] in the above-mentioned thread, the bdflush tuning parameters > you suggested made no difference in my test case other than slightly adjusting > the temporal relationship between writeout and file transfer. -aa still performs > slightly worse than both 2.4.17 stock and -rmap. 2.4.13-ac7 currently beats > all competitors. Then can you verify the bandwith you get out of the network card is the same across 2.4.13-ac7 and all the other kernels you are trying. Also please check with an hdparm -t the speed you get out of IDE is the same. This sounds like some driver changed (note that -ac is used to queue lots of driver updates) and that made the difference. Otherwise if we wakeup bdflush early enough I don't see why it takes more time. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/