Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758852AbYFWPQW (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:16:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755286AbYFWPQO (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:16:14 -0400 Received: from smtp6.pp.htv.fi ([213.243.153.40]:50040 "EHLO smtp6.pp.htv.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755229AbYFWPQN (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:16:13 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:14:17 +0300 From: Adrian Bunk To: Bob Peterson Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , cluster-devel@redhat.com, Dave Jones , Linux Kernel Mailing List , bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, Steven Whitehouse Subject: Re: [Cluster-devel] Re: [Bug 10827] 2.6.26rc4 GFS2 oops. Message-ID: <20080623151417.GA28779@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> References: <20080622090906.GD27069@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <1214232039.3724.66.camel@technetium.msp.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1214232039.3724.66.camel@technetium.msp.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2036 Lines: 64 On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 09:40:39AM -0500, Bob Peterson wrote: > On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 12:09 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:12:03PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > > of recent regressions. > > > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10827 > > > Subject : 2.6.26rc4 GFS2 oops. > > > Submitter : Dave Jones > > > Date : 2008-05-27 15:44 (19 days old) > > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/27/297 > > > > Dave, what is the status of this bug? > > > > It's currently listed as a 2.6.26-rc regression. > > > > Is it actually confirmed that 2.6.25 is fine? > > > > According to the thread of the bug report there should now be a bug > > report in the Red Hat Bugzilla for it. Bug number? > > > > Thanks > > Adrian > > Hi, > > This appears to be a known bug. There's a Fedora bugzilla record for > it here, which contains a patch to fix the problem: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448866 Thanks for the pointer. > The bug does not appear to be in 2.6.25; 2.6.25 is fine afaict. Yup, the patch in your Bugzilla is for code that is new in 2.6.26. Can you push your patch for inclusion into 2.6.26 so that 2.6.26 won't get released with this regression? > Regards, > > Bob Peterson > Red Hat GFS Thanks Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/