Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S289171AbSAQP03>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:26:29 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S289172AbSAQP0T>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:26:19 -0500
Received: from mx3out.umbc.edu ([130.85.253.53]:50078 "EHLO mx3out.umbc.edu")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S289171AbSAQP0J>;
	Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:26:09 -0500
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:25:39 -0500
From: John Jasen <jjasen1@umbc.edu>
X-X-Sender: <jjasen1@irix2.gl.umbc.edu>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
cc: V-man <venom@DarkStar.sns.it>, <rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Rik spreading bullshit about VM
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0201162230550.32617-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.31L.02.0201171023470.1464582-100000@irix2.gl.umbc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Rik van Riel wrote:

> On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, V-man wrote:
>
> > So basically Ri's assertion is far from truth on many aspects.
>
> That assumes it is my assertion, it appears the journalist in
> question is missing a few lines from his IRC log though...

Then, in the interests of ending this flamewar quickly, why don't you
email clarifications to the author, cc'ing Andreas, lkml, and letting the
slashdotter children know of it?

--
-- John E. Jasen (jjasen1@umbc.edu)
-- In theory, theory and practise are the same. In practise, they aren't.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/