Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762093AbYFWSiy (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:38:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757489AbYFWSip (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:38:45 -0400 Received: from gir.skynet.ie ([193.1.99.77]:44325 "EHLO gir.skynet.ie" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756700AbYFWSin (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:38:43 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:38:41 +0100 From: Mel Gorman To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Daniel J Blueman , Christoph Lameter , Linus Torvalds , Alexander Beregalov , Linux Kernel , xfs@oss.sgi.com, david@fromorbit.com Subject: Re: [2.6.26-rc7] shrink_icache from pagefault locking (nee: nfsd hangs for a few sec)... Message-ID: <20080623183840.GA1824@csn.ul.ie> References: <6278d2220806220256g674304ectb945c14e7e09fede@mail.gmail.com> <6278d2220806220258p28de00c1x615ad7b2f708e3f8@mail.gmail.com> <20080622221930.GA11558@disturbed> <20080623002415.GB21597@csn.ul.ie> <20080623072227.GB11986@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080623072227.GB11986@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1467 Lines: 30 On (23/06/08 03:22), Christoph Hellwig didst pronounce: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 01:24:15AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > In that case, have you any theory as to why this circular dependency is > > being reported now but wasn't before 2.6.26-rc1? I'm beginning to wonder > > if the bisecting fingering the zonelist modifiation is just a > > co-incidence. > > I've seen this traces since lockdep was added when running xfsqa. > Oh right, so this isn't even 2.6.26-rc1 as such. It's an older problem that seems to be happening in more cases now, right? At this point, I believe the bisection fingering the zonelist modification was a co-incidence as reclaim behaviour at least is equivilant although catching the memory leak early was a lucky positive outcome. It's still not clear why the circular warning is happening more regularly now but it's "something else". Considering the number of changes made to NFS, XFS, reclaim and other areas since, I'm not sure how to go about finding the real underlying problem or if it can be dealt with in a trivial manner. -- Mel Gorman Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/