Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760913AbYFWTMn (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:12:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755273AbYFWTMd (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:12:33 -0400 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.30]:25971 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754197AbYFWTMb (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:12:31 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; b=Aa7r6g5BvOttqal0+rlOTBdyctCY0aCRPPZbG5GMau81OXaN8J5GWtPg4vfMTjmzyy ghpDHnbIHidjOlqsk5cXOmFHpQLHzj1r60gjM2T4bVDZVrtvPIepvJAiTJeLNDfm/ASG 6WbB3z6O6vFzPIWGvdgma6Wbp29os668rXAyE= From: Denys Vlasenko To: Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s), linux-embedded@vger list Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:12:30 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: David Woodhouse , Andi Kleen , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Paul Gortmaker , linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tim Bird References: <1209577322.25560.402.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <200806231922.10864.vda.linux@googlemail.com> <20080623185728.GB30550@uranus.ravnborg.org> In-Reply-To: <20080623185728.GB30550@uranus.ravnborg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200806232112.30393.vda.linux@googlemail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1139 Lines: 31 On Monday 23 June 2008 20:57, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > I agree. And if we do want to pay attention to pure code size, there are > > > other approaches -- like --gc-sections > > > > I have some patches in this area too. Were submitted to Sam > > but he was too busy it seems. > > They were not trivial to apply and so went down on the TODO list. I realize that they were not trivial to review, but that was unavoidable. They were even more not trivial to create. > We could try to push the generic and x86 specific .lds stuff via > the arch maintainers? IIRC I splitted the entire GC collection patch in a way that first patches were doing exactly this easier first part and I hoped that at least these first patches will be taken. They were big, but somewhat trivial, from "it's obviously safe" department. Had they been applied, now making --gc-sections to work would be easier. -- vda -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/