Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:36:21 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20080623.143621.195102953.davem@davemloft.net>
To: gregkh@suse.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, jmforbes@linuxtx.org,
       zwane@arm.linux.org.uk, tytso@mit.edu, rdunlap@xenotime.net,
       davej@redhat.com, chuckw@quantumlinux.com, reviews@ml.cw.f00f.org,
       mkrufky@linuxtv.org, cebbert@redhat.com, cavokz@gmail.com, w@1wt.eu,
       rbranco@la.checkpoint.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
       akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [patch 3/5] sctp: Make sure N * sizeof(union sctp_addr) does
 not overflow.
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080622202847.GA20800@suse.de>
References: <20080622190136.GC20141@suse.de>
	<20080622.122332.220246399.davem@davemloft.net>
	<20080622202847.GA20800@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 947
Lines: 27

From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:28:47 -0700

> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:23:32PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
> > Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 12:01:36 -0700
> > 
> > > 2.6.25-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us
> > > know.
> > 
> > Unfortunately, Vlad found another case in SCTP which has
> > an overflow bug similar to this one.  I'll work on a
> > fix for that today and submit.
> 
> Thanks for letting me know, I'll wait for that one as well before doing
> this release.

This one turned out to be a false alarm, and Vlad confirmed my
analysis today.  So there is no other SCTP patch you need to
wait for.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/