Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758301AbYFXGrV (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 02:47:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752343AbYFXGrM (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 02:47:12 -0400 Received: from sca-es-mail-2.Sun.COM ([192.18.43.133]:41251 "EHLO sca-es-mail-2.sun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751931AbYFXGrL (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 02:47:11 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:47:07 -0600 From: Andreas Dilger Subject: Re: [PATCH] extX: convert prink(KERN_WARNING) to extX_warning() In-reply-to: <20080623133855.c00ddaa7.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> To: Randy Dunlap Cc: FD Cami , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Kasper Sandberg Message-id: <20080624064707.GF6239@webber.adilger.int> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-GPG-Key: 1024D/0D35BED6 X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7A37 5D79 BF1B CECA D44F 8A29 A488 39F5 0D35 BED6 References: <20080622201841.669ff882@olorin> <20080623203107.GD6239@webber.adilger.int> <20080623133855.c00ddaa7.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1433 Lines: 37 On Jun 23, 2008 13:38 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:31:07 -0600 Andreas Dilger wrote: > > > ext3_warning(sb, __func__, > > > - "updating to rev %d because of new feature flag, " > > > - "running e2fsck is recommended", > > > - EXT3_DYNAMIC_REV); > > > + "updating to rev %d because of new feature flag, " > > > + "running e2fsck is recommended", > > > + EXT3_DYNAMIC_REV); > > > > Please don't change all of the indenting. The old indending is proper > > linux coding style (aligned with previous '('), the new one is not. > > Hi, > I don't mind which way it's done, but I'm curious: are you saying that > aligning with '(' is codified (e.g., in CodingStyle) or just that it's > dominant? You're right - it isn't in the Linux CodingStyle... It is the style that we use for Lustre that explicitly requires aligning with '('. The common stype definitely IS to align with the previous '(' if a line is a continuation. That said, it is IMHO bad form to go and change all of the indenting of existing code with little reason to do so. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/