Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760009AbYFXLsw (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 07:48:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752876AbYFXLsn (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 07:48:43 -0400 Received: from smtp5.pp.htv.fi ([213.243.153.39]:35551 "EHLO smtp5.pp.htv.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751468AbYFXLsm (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 07:48:42 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:46:43 +0300 From: Adrian Bunk To: David Woodhouse Cc: Peter Korsgaard , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravnborg.org, dhowells@redhat.com, andi@firstfloor.org, "Kirill A. Shutemov" , ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, takata@linux-m32r.org, linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org, kyle@mcmartin.ca, matthew@wil.cx, grundler@parisc-linux.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, lethal@linux-sh.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, gerg@uclinux.org, jdike@addtoit.com Subject: Re: architectures with ARCH_SUPPORTS_AOUT but no binfmt_aout Message-ID: <20080624114643.GB16021@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> References: <1213604973-7073-1-git-send-email-jacmet@sunsite.dk> <1213617663.26255.708.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20080616121727.GB10854@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <1213619214.26255.721.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20080617084235.GA20169@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <1213696004.26255.960.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20080617101112.GE20169@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <1213702113.26255.996.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20080622094907.GF27069@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <1214134850.2409.2.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1214134850.2409.2.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1019 Lines: 34 On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:40:50PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 12:49 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > What about m68knommu? > > > > I don't know whether it was intentionally available there, but the > > removal in your patch does not seem to be intentional. > > Hm, true. Well spotted. I think it's probably correct though -- I don't > think m68knommu can really support a.out binaries, can it? I found another similar case: X86_32 UML. a.out is most likely working there? > dwmw2 cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/