Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757251AbYFYMQz (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:16:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754852AbYFYMQp (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:16:45 -0400 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.226]:13308 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754113AbYFYMQo (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:16:44 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=sgs2qgLavU0xrw/zrNOpVdvp12yr5ctljZm7wrUvM1l0GXqzZ04t1TxFD1C/j1+WoW xW7tSqpnINFMF9oncBe5Nbii64G/cQSW/rwCOrdQZ5QIh2S1/x76eja89Igh89pae/li hlNVbAseXes411VkdGgcdxYDOE/qRKUAACr2w= Message-ID: Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:16:42 +0200 From: "Michael Kerrisk" To: "Bart Van Assche" Subject: Re: When did High-Resolution Timers hit mainline? Cc: "Thomas Gleixner" , "Ingo Molnar" , lkml , "Roman Zippel" , "john stultz" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2036 Lines: 50 Hi Bart, Thanks for taking a look at this. On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:08 AM, Michael Kerrisk > wrote: >> The Software Clock, HZ, and Jiffies >> The accuracy of various system calls that set timeouts, (e.g., >> select(2), sigtimedwait(2)) and measure CPU time (e.g., >> getrusage(2)) is limited by the resolution of the software >> clock, a clock maintained by the kernel which measures time in >> jiffies. The size of a jiffy is determined by the value of the >> kernel constant HZ. > > Maybe "size of a jiffy" should be replaced by "duration of a jiffy" ? Actually, IMO size feels better in this context. > An explanation of the impact of CONFIG_NO_HZ is missing. I'm not sure whether it's needed here. Can you say a little more about why you think something needs to be said (and perhaps even suggest some text then)? > You also missed the fact that since the 2.6 kernel there are two > constants related to time resolution, namely HZ and USER_HZ. HZ is the > frequency of the timer interrupt, and 1/USER_HZ is the time resolution > for system calls that use jiffies as time unit (e.g. the five values > returned by the times() system call). The time resolution of e.g. the > select() and poll() system calls is 1.0/HZ since the timeout for these > system calls is specified as a struct timeval or struct timespec. Good point! I will come up with some text for this. Cheers, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ man-pages online: http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online_pages.html Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/