Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758052AbYFYNhl (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:37:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756125AbYFYNhd (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:37:33 -0400 Received: from n21.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.206.160]:23692 "HELO n21.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755995AbYFYNhc (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:37:32 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 377 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:37:32 EDT X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 330976.57149.bm@omp509.mail.sp1.yahoo.com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=PmJ1t1IrZARnkPAmceL1GGXlUM0dMhkNnQki09GGz9JuzPn6UKRjGWnydblQW9Ps44+a29qf+LPIiUdeka3DjUnRuu2f4vamgWoE0dOJxnYMdckczCCZzuC5+DWM13jLYxunLr8UGWDq4V0zB5UQJPMcjxUi3wKraEUfONCJnkU=; X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.199 Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 06:31:14 -0700 (PDT) From: barry bouwsma Reply-To: free_beer_for_all@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] UTC timestamp option for FAT filesystems To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Joe Peterson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <223222.41388.qm@web46108.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2200 Lines: 58 Moin moin! May I just add a resounding YES-YES-YES to the message which was posted earlier today as Message-ID: <> oh b*gger, that doesn't help when snarfing from a web archive (voluntary use as a non-subscirber of a webmail interface prevents me from including a References: header without more effort than I care to do now, not that this would help) I was actually just about to post an almost identical message today to clean out my repository of hacks, with almost the same justifications. In addition, may I request that not only the option `-o utc,...' be accepted, but also as an alternate, the string `gmt', not because it's more accurate (it isn't) but because it seems to be tradition to use GMT+/-xxxx in lots of places. Another justification which wasn't mentioned, but which I would put forth, is that last time I checked, the BSDen were using UTC as their MSDOS timestamp base, so such an option would make it easier to exchange data between BSD and Linux machines with a normal USB stick or flash card. And I was doing that a year or three ago when I hacked my hack. I'll have to do a line-by-line comparison with my hacked code (last applied to 2.6.24-ish) to make sure I don't have any differences, but in order to allow users the option to specify the seeped-in-tradition- especially-for-us-old-f*rts `gmt', here's the trivial-to-correct section of code -- may well be different than in the patch since I didn't save it before being kicked offline: in fs/fat/inode.c 880 {Opt_debug, "debug"}, 881 {Opt_immutable, "sys_immutable"}, 882 /* XXX HACK */ 883 {Opt_utc, "utc"}, 884 {Opt_utc, "gmt"}, 885 {Opt_obsolate, "conv=binary"}, 886 {Opt_obsolate, "conv=text"}, (I use `-o utc' myself but would prefer to be flexible to alternate uses) I notice this most when I fail to include the needed patches when updating kernel thanks barry bouwsma -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/