Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762241AbYFZMyh (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:54:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759085AbYFZMiX (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:38:23 -0400 Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:49565 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758288AbYFZMiU (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:38:20 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:38:32 +0200 From: Bernhard Walle (by way of Bernhard Walle ) To: Vivek Goyal Message-ID: <20080626143832.49948500@halley.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20080626123518.GA3878@redhat.com> References: <20080625221635.GD32344@redhat.com> <1214465001-12338-1-git-send-email-bwalle@suse.de> <20080626012337.a73c91d2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080626102803.2a1a46cd@halley.suse.de> <20080626123518.GA3878@redhat.com> Organization: SUSE Linux Products GmbH X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.4.0 (GTK+ 2.12.9; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) X-Face: ,G!z)dEOMkc[Cu+sF64,T9^5r3b>/}#HBRL%D^j@\SZbr'Itl7q@1<*dgB?A7(_leO1Tc4^ D*WfvfwKcz;,@E^y+pNP%86n8o<&g-vToCXW:r>Y$jxY,`KT?{H!07=2|Jdt?0ba^C-Tnx50vIV8It vi&Sicl:sj`k2`y)E;ECFi;i7W-?t3%\kD*));q)+%-pQd^.r'W}oBBx=+.~Gu}&F;lS7.a-m>Rv"w pe`D'OV^?HJd$-)7<2T[naDPl6+bAj'+UYd]u]B^'.LYK$2jS Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL from kdump Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1295 Lines: 35 * Vivek Goyal [2008-06-26 08:35]: > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:28:03AM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote: > > * Andrew Morton [2008-06-26 01:23]: > > > > > > > > config PROC_VMCORE > > > > bool "/proc/vmcore support (EXPERIMENTAL)" > > > > - depends on PROC_FS && EXPERIMENTAL && CRASH_DUMP > > > > + depends on PROC_FS && CRASH_DUMP > > > > default y > > > > help > > > > Exports the dump image of crashed kernel in ELF format. > > > > > > What about powerpc, sh and ia64? > > > > At least for ia64 I wouldn't consider it as experimental. Don't know > > about SH and PPC. But should we mark it as EXPERIMENTAL on all > > platforms only because some "exotic" (at least SH) platforms have kdump > > not very long implemented? > > It has been present long enough on ia64 and ppc64. Only new entry seems > to be SH. I would think of leaving it EXPERIMENTAL only on SH. So, "PROC_FS && (!SH || EXPERIMENTAL) && CRASH_DUMP" ? Bernhard -- Bernhard Walle, SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Architecture Development -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/