Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 19:00:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 19:00:09 -0500 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:8717 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:59:59 -0500 Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:59:30 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Davidsen To: Rik van Riel cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH *] rmap VM 11c In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Rik van Riel wrote: > For this release, IO tests are very much welcome ... > > > The third maintenance release of the 11th version of the reverse > mapping based VM is now available. > This is an attempt at making a more robust and flexible VM > subsystem, while cleaning up a lot of code at the same time. > The patch is available from: > > http://surriel.com/patches/2.4/2.4.17-rmap-11c > and http://linuxvm.bkbits.net/ Rik, I tried a simple test, building a kernel in a 128M P-II-400, and when the load average got up to 50 or so the system became slow;-) On the other hand it was still usable for most normal things other then incoming mail which properly blocks at LA>10 or so. I'll be trying it on a large machine tomorrow, but it at least looks stable. In real life no sane person would do that, would they? Make with a nice -10 was essentially invisible. Maybe tomorrow the lateest -aa kernel on the same machine, with and without my own personal patch. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/