Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:18:29 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, matthew@wil.cx, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Extend completions to provide XFS object flush
	requirements
Message-ID: <20080626131829.GT29319@disturbed>
Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, xfs@oss.sgi.com,
	matthew@wil.cx, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <1214455277-6387-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1214455277-6387-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20080626074636.GB7064@infradead.org> <20080626112133.GJ11558@disturbed> <20080626130700.GA24325@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080626130700.GA24325@infradead.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 915
Lines: 27

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 09:07:00AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 09:21:33PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > Ok, so that involves exactly what? A new header file, a new API name
> > (ideas anyone?) and kerneldoc comments?
> 
> Yes, probably just a new header with properly documented functions.
> Thew two non-trivial ones you added should probably not be inlines,
> btw.

Yeah, they grew a little bigger than expected...

> flush_lock_init/flush_lock/flush_trylock/flush_done/flush_is_locked?

Ok, I was thinking along those lines. I'll redo the patch series
using that interface tomorrow.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/