Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:32:12 +0200
From: Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@atmel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
       Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org,
       kernel@avr32linux.org, shannon.nelson@intel.com,
       David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] dmaengine: Add slave DMA interface
Message-ID: <20080626153212.543be415@hskinnemo-gx745.norway.atmel.com>
In-Reply-To: <1214486603-23655-4-git-send-email-haavard.skinnemoen@atmel.com>
References: <1214486603-23655-1-git-send-email-haavard.skinnemoen@atmel.com>
	<1214486603-23655-2-git-send-email-haavard.skinnemoen@atmel.com>
	<1214486603-23655-3-git-send-email-haavard.skinnemoen@atmel.com>
	<1214486603-23655-4-git-send-email-haavard.skinnemoen@atmel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 933
Lines: 24

Ok, I guess I didn't update all the patch descriptions properly...

Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@atmel.com> wrote:
> A new struct dma_slave_descriptor is added. This extends the standard
> dma_async_tx_descriptor with a few members that are needed for doing
> slave DMA from/to peripherals.

This isn't correct anymore, as the dma_slave_descriptor struct turned
out not to be needed after all.

> A new operation for creating such descriptors is added to struct
> dma_device.

This isn't entirely correct either -- regular dma_async_tx_descriptors
are created, but one such descriptor can represent a whole scatterlist.

I'll update the changelog for the next round...

Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/