Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755451AbYFZRoz (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:44:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752036AbYFZRos (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:44:48 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:59128 "EHLO gprs189-60.eurotel.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751723AbYFZRor (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:44:47 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:35:36 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Alok Kataria Cc: kernel list Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86:Use cpu_khz for loops_per_jiffy calculation Message-ID: <20080626173536.GA16783@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1212540069.19290.57.camel@promb-2n-dhcp368.eng.vmware.com> <20080603182014.79a38d03@infradead.org> <35f686220806032101h103152dat841818982aaa5052@mail.gmail.com> <20080604061637.6bab3f67@infradead.org> <1213924953.27983.52.camel@promb-2n-dhcp368.eng.vmware.com> <20080620113922.GG7439@elte.hu> <1213999593.31598.52.camel@promb-2n-dhcp368.eng.vmware.com> <20080624175753.GG5642@ucw.cz> <1214500831.3351.10.camel@promb-2n-dhcp368.eng.vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1214500831.3351.10.camel@promb-2n-dhcp368.eng.vmware.com> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1855 Lines: 53 On Thu 2008-06-26 10:20:31, Alok Kataria wrote: > On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 10:57 -0700, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > On X86 platform we can use the value of tsc_khz computed during tsc calibration > > > to calculate the loops_per_jiffy value. Its very important to keep the error in > > > lpj values to minimum as any error in that may result in kernel panic in > > > check_timer. > > > In virtualization environment, On a highly overloaded host the guest delay > > > calibration may sometimes result in errors beyond the ~50% that timer_irq_works > > > can handle, resulting in the guest panicking. > > > > How did you adress 'khz has nothing to do with loops per jiffie' > > comment? > > > > Some cpus can do loop in cycle , some need two cycles, some need half. > > Hi Pavel, > > When you say loops per jiffies has nothing to do with khz, by khz you > mean the cpu frequency, right ? Yes. > AFAIU in calibrate_delay_direct too we measure the amount by which timer > has ticked until DELAY_CALIBRATION_TICKS amount of jiffies has passed. > So IMO the code there too assumes that there is one loop per timer > cycle ? On my machine, it reports: delay using timer specific routine.. 3661.98 BogoMIPS (lpj=7323971) ... Detected 1828.828 MHz processor. (/proc/cpuinfo) model name : Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2400 @ 1.83GHz ... cpu MHz : 1000.000 ... bogomips : 3657.54 So you'd break it by setting lpj (aka bogomips) to cpu_khz, right? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/