Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 19:38:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 19:38:43 -0500 Received: from pc-62-31-92-140-az.blueyonder.co.uk ([62.31.92.140]:60897 "EHLO kushida.apsleyroad.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 19:38:34 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 00:34:44 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier To: William Lee Irwin III , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: hashed waitqueues Message-ID: <20020118003444.A3980@kushida.apsleyroad.org> In-Reply-To: <20020104094049.A10326@holomorphy.com> <20020104173923.B10391@holomorphy.com> <20020116142140.A31993@kushida.apsleyroad.org> <20020116094226.A760@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020116094226.A760@holomorphy.com>; from wli@holomorphy.com on Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 09:42:26AM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org William Lee Irwin III wrote: > Regardless, various arches want non-multiplicative hash functions and > they'll be getting them. These hash functions will certainly prove > useful in getting a broader base to test against. I don't care to have > a "pet" hash function, only one that is good as possible. Take a look at these too. Not much information about how good they are, but they do provide yet more examples to test, if you're testing. http://www.physik.tu-muenchen.de/lehrstuehle/T32/matpack/html/LibDoc/Strings/strings.html http://www.physik.tu-muenchen.de/lehrstuehle/T32/matpack/source/Strings/ -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/