Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 23:36:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 23:36:48 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:56583 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 23:36:43 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 02:36:02 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Bosko Radivojevic Cc: Erik Mouw , Andrea Arcangeli , Subject: vm philosophising In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Bosko Radivojevic wrote: > There is no way to make one good VM for all possible situations. But, > you can tune/make one VM to work great on large DBMS (e.g.) and > tune/make another one to work great on ordinary desktop systems This is an interesting assertion ... but up to date nobody has been able to tell me what exactly should be different between these two mythical VMs ;) regards, Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/